Control Siglent SDG1025 with python (bonus: add web access using any SBC)


When you’re an electronic engineer you have some standard equipment on your bench. A few multimeters, a soldering station, a bench-top PSU and an oscilloscope. Some of us have also a frequency counter and a waveform generator. If your equipment is quite new then probably it has some kind of communication interface to connect and control the device remotely. That’s very useful in some cases, because you can do a lot of fancy things. The problem usually is that if you’re a Linux user, then you don’t this that easy, as the EE world is dominated by Windows. Nevertheless, nowadays there are solutions sometimes, which are also open source and that makes it easy to take full control.

This post is about how to control the Siglent SDG1000 waveform generator series using Python. I own an SDG1025, so I’ve only tested on this, but it should be the same for all the series.

Siglent SDG1025

A few words about SDG1025, though if you’re reading this you probably already have it already on your bench. SDG1025 is an arbitrary function generator that is able to output a maximum frequency of 25MHz for sine, square and Gaussian noise; but less for other signals (e.g. 5MHz for pulse and arbitrary waves). It has a dual channel output and the second channel can also be used as a frequency counter.

This is the device user manual with more info and that’s how it looks like.

What makes SDG1025 special is its price and the features that comes with this. This is not a hobbyist neither a pro equipment, regarding the price range. It lies somewhere in the middle, but by doing a very small and easy modification it gets in the semi-pro range. This modification is to change the XTAL on the motherboard with a better TCXO, as the motherboard has already the footprint and also it’s an easy to do modification. You can find 25MHz TCXOs with 0.1 or 0.3 ppm in ebay for ~15-10 EUR and this will make the input/ouput much more accurate. It is questionable though if those old format TCXOs are capable of such low ppm accuracy, but in any case with a bit more effort you can also use a new SMD TCXO as long as it has TTL level output. This is a video that shows this modification, if you’re interested.

Another big plus of SDG1025 is the USB communication port. This port is used for communication between your workstation and the instrument and it supports the Virtual Instrument Software Architecture (VISA) API.

The only negative thing I can think of about the SDG1025, is that the fan is loud. I think that would be probably my next hack on the SDG1025, but I don’t use it that often to really consider doing it, yet.


VISA is a standard communication protocol made by various companies, but you probably know it from the National Instrument’s NI-VISA, which is used in LabView. This protocol is available over Ethernet, GPIB, serial, USB e.t.c. and it’s quite a simple protocol where the host queries the device and gets the devie sends a response to the host. The response can be some meaningful data or just an acknowledgement of the received command.

The problem with VISA is that almost all the tools and drivers are made for Windows. You see LabView was a big thing in the Windows XP era (and I guess it still probably is in some industries) as it was easier for people who didn’t know programming to create monitoring and control tools and create automations using LabView. Of course, a lot of things have changed since then and to be honest I’m not aware of the current state of LabView. At some point I believe it was used also from engineers who knew about programming, but at the time LabView had become a de facto tool in the industry and also people preferred the nice GUI elements that it was offering. I remember at that time (early 2000’s) I was using Borland’s VCL components with Borland C++ and Delphi to create my own GUIs for instrument control, instead of LabView. I remember I was finding easier to do use VCL and C++ than use the LabView workflow. Oh, the VCL! It was an awesome library ahead of its time and I wonder why it didn’t conquer the market…

Anyway, because Windows are favored when it comes to those tools, the Linux users are left behind. Times have changed though and although Linux should be considered as the main development platform, some companies are left a bit behind or they provide solutions and support only to specific partners.

USB Port

Now let’s get back to the SDG1025. In the rear side of the generator there’s a USB port, as you can see from this image.

That USB port is used for communicating with your workstation and it supports two modes of operation, USBRAW and USBTMC.

USBTMC stands for USB Test and Measurement Class. You might know this already from those cheap 8-ch, 24MHz network analyzers that sold on ebay and some of which are based on the CY7C68013A EZ-USB. Those analyzers claim compatibility with Sigrok software suite, which supports USBTMC.

Supporting USBTMC, doesn’t mean that your device is supported (e.g. SDG1025). It only means that your device supports that class specification; therefore you could integrate your device to Sigrok if you like, but you have to add the support. So, it’s just a protocol specification and not the communication protocol specific details, which are different and custom for each device and equipment.

So, let’s go back to the SDG1025. You can select the USB mode by pressing the Utility button and browse to this menu [Utility >> Interface >> USB Setup]. There you’ll find those two options:

In this menu you need to select the USBTMC option.

Now connect the USB cable to your Linux machine and run the lsusb command which should print a line like this.

$ lsusb
Bus 008 Device 002: ID f4ed:ee3a Shenzhen Siglent Co., Ltd. SDG1010 Waveform Generator (TMC mode)

That means that your workstation recognises the SDG1025 and it’s also set to the correct mode (USBTMC). Now all is left is to be able to communicate with the device.

Host controller

Usually when you want to control an equipment you need to use your workstation. But that’s not always the case, as you could also use a small Linux SBC. Therefore, in this post I’ll assume that the host controller is the nanopi-neo SBC, which is based on the Allwinner H3 that has a Quad-core Cortex-A7 that runs up to 1.2GHz. This small board costs $10 and it’s powerful enough to perform in some tasks better that other more expensive SBCs.

Therefore, since we’re talking about Linux you have the flexibility to use whatever hardware you like as the host controller. In this case, the nanopi-neo can convert actually the SDG1025 to an Ethernet controlled device, therefore you can use an SBC with WiFi to do the same and control the SDG1025 via your WiFi network. Anyway you get the idea, it’s very flexible. Also the power consumption of these small SBCs is very low, too.

Therefore, from now on the commands that I’m going to use are the same regardless the host controller. Finally, for the nanopi-neo I’ve built the Armbian 5.93 git version, but you can also download a pre-built image from here.

Communicate with the SDG1025

Let’s assume that you’re have booted your Linux host and you have a console terminal. In general, when it comes to python, the best practise is to always use a virtual environment. That makes things easier, because if you break something you don’t break your main environment but the virtual. To setup your host, create a new virtual environment and install the needed dependencies, use these commands:

# Update system
sudo apt update
sudo apt -y upgrade

# Install needed packages
sudo apt install python3-venv
sudo apt install python3-pip
sudo apt install libusb-1.0-0-dev

# Creae a new environment
mkdir ~/pyenv
cd ~/pyenv
python3 -m venv sdg1025
source ~/pyenv/sdg1025/bin/activate

# Install python dependencies
pip3 install setuptools
pip3 install pyusb

After the running the “source ~/pyenv/sdg1025/bin/activate” command, you should see in your prompt the environment name. For example, on my nanopi-neo I see this prompt:

(sdg1025) dimtass@nanopineo:~$

That means that now you’re working on the virtual environment and all the python modules you’re installing are installed in that environment. To deactivate the virtual environment you run this command


Finally, you always need to activate this environment when you need to communicate with the sdg1025 and use those tools.

source ~/pyenv/sdg1025/bin/activate

If everything works fine for you and you didn’t brake anything in the process, then if you don’t like using this virtual env, you can just install the same tools as before without creating the virtual env and skip those steps. From now on though, I’ll assume that the virtual env is used.

Now you need to create a udev rule, so your user gets permissions to operate on the USB device, as by default only root has access to that. If you remember in a previous step, you’ve run the lsusb command and you got an output similar to this:

$ lsusb
Bus 008 Device 002: ID f4ed:ee3a Shenzhen Siglent Co., Ltd. SDG1010 Waveform Generator (TMC mode)

From this output you need the USB VID and PID numbers which are the f4ed and ee3a in this case. Your SDG1025 should have the same VID/PID. Now you need to create a new udev rule with those IDs.

sudo nano /etc/udev/rules.d/51-siglent-sdg1025.rules

And then copy this line and save the file.

SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ATTRS{idVendor}=="f4ed", ATTRS{idProduct}=="ee3a", MODE="0666"

Now you need to update and re-trigger the rules with this command:

sudo udevadm control --reload-rules && sudo udevadm trigger

If you haven’t already connected the USB cable from the SDG1025 to your host, you can do it now.


The last piece you need is the python-usbtmc module, which you can download from here:

This is the module which implements the USBTMC protocol and you can use to script with python. To install it run those commands:

git clone
cd python-usbtmc
sudo python install
cd ../
rm -rf python-usbtmc

If everything went smoothly then now you should be able to test the communication between the host and the SDG1025. To do this launch python3 and you should see something like this:

(sdg1025) $ python3
Python 3.6.8 (default, Jan 14 2019, 11:02:34) 
[GCC 8.0.1 20180414 (experimental) [trunk revision 259383]] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.

The next commands are used to import the python-usbtmc module and list the connected USBTMC devices that are connected on the system

>>> import usbtmc
>>> usbtmc.list_resources()

As you can see, the list_resources() function listed the SDG1025. Now you need to copy this exact string and use it to instantiate a new instrument object.

>>> sdg = usbtmc.Instrument('USB::62000::60000::SDG10GA1234567::INSTR')

In your case this string will be different, of course, as it also contains the device serial number. Now you can poll the device and get some basic information.

>>> print(sdg.ask("*IDN?"))
*IDN SDG,SDG1025,SDG10GA1234567,,04-00-00-30-28

The *IDN? is a standard protocol command that sends back some basic information. In this case it’s the device name, serial number and firmware version.

You’re done! Now you can control the SDG1025 via USB.

Supported commands

The SDG1025 supports a lot of commands that pretty much can control all the functionality of the device and there’s a full list of the supported commands in this document. Yes, it’s a quite large document and there are many commands in there, but you don’t really need them all, right? You should have a look at all in order to decide which seem more interesting for you to create some custom scripts. The very basic commands, I think, are the BSWV (BASIC_WAVE) and OUTP (OUTPUT).

The BSWV sets or gets basic wave parameters and you can use it to control the output waveform. To read the current output setup of channel 1 run this:

>>> sdg.ask("C1:BSWV?")

As you can guess C1means channel 1, so for channel 2 you should run this

>>> sdg.ask("C2:BSWV?")

Therefore, if you want to set the CH1 frequency to a 3V3, 10MHz, square output, you need to run this:

>>> sdg.write('C1:BSWV WVTP,SQUARE,FRQ,10000000,AMP,3.3V')

As you can see though, the BSWV command only configures the output, but it doesn’t also enable it by default. You need the OUTP command to do that. Therefore, to enable the CH1 output with that configuration you need to run this

>>> sdg.write('C1:OUTP ON')

You can disable the output like this:

>>> instr.write('C1:OUTP OFF')

Finally, you can query the output state like this

>>> sdg.ask('C1:OUTP?')

From the response, you see that you can also control the output load (LOAD) and the polarity (PLRT). NOR means that the polarity is normal, but you can set it to INVT if you want to inverse it.

At this point it should be clear what you can do with this module and the supported commands. Now that you know that you can script with python and control the device, you can understand how many things you can do. It’s awesome!

Just read the Programming Guide document and do your magic.

Bonus: Create a web control using the nanopi-neo

This wouldn’t be a proper stupid project if this was missing, so I couldn’t resist the temptation. As bonus material I’ll show you how to use the nanopi-neo (or any other SBC) to do some basic control on the output via a web interface using python, flask and websockets. I won’t really get into the code details, but the code is free to use and edit and you can get it this repo:

In order to run the code you need to follow all the commands in the previous sections to install a virtual env and python-usbtmc. Additionally, you need to install a couple of things more in order to support flask and wtforms on which my web interface is based on. In my case I’ve used the nanopi-neo and also my workstation and it worked fine on both. Now type those commands:

pip3 install flask
pip3 install wtforms
pip3 install flask-socketio
pip3 install eventlet

The last command which installs the eventlet package may fail, but it doesn’t really matter. This package is for installing the eventlet async mode, which makes websockets faster. Without it the default mode is set to threading, which is still fast but not that fast (I’ve seen around 2ms ping times using websockets with eventlet and ~30ms with threading).

Now that you’ve installed the packages, you can run the code, but first you need to connect the USB cable on the nanopi-neo (or whatever) and the SDG1025. This is everything connected together (in the photo the web-interface is already running).

Now, run these commands (includes also the repo clone).

git clone
cd web-interface-for-sdg1025

And that’s it. You should see in the output messages like the following:

[SDG1025]: Connecting to the first available device: USB::62701::60986::SDG10GA4150816::INSTR
[SDG1025]: Connected to: SDG10GA4150816
Starting Flask web server...
Open this link to your browser:

That means that everything worked fine. Now, if the web app is running on the nanopi-neo (or wherever), open your browser and connect to its IP address and port 5000. And you will see something like this:

Note: in the picture the frequency should be (HZ) and not (KHz), but I’ve fixed that in the repo.

When the interface is opened, then it reads the current configuration for both channels and then updates all the needed elements on the web interface. You can use the controls to play around with the interface. I’ll also post a video that I’ve made using the nanopi-neo running the web server and my tablet to control the SDG1025. Excuse some delays when using controls on my tablet, but it’s because the touch screen is problematic. I won’t buy a new tablet until is completely fallen apart. For now it serves its purpose just fine.


Most of the new equipment are coming with some kind of communication interface, which is really nice and you can use it to perform a lot of automated tasks. The problem is that most of those devices support Windows only. This is an old habit for most of the companies as they either can’t see the value in supporting Linux platforms or the engineers are still left in the 00’s era where Windows XP was the ultimate platform for engineers.

Anyway, for whatever the reason, there is hope if your equipment supports a standard protocol or class; because then you can probably find (or develop your own) module and then do whatever you like. For the SDG1025 I’ve used the python-usbtmc module which is open and available here. I’ve also used Flask to develop a web app. The front-end is made with HTML, javascript (jquery + jquery-ui) and the back-end is written in Python. The reason I’ve used Flask, is because it was easier to integrate the python-usbtmc module in the web app and Flask is really nice and mature enough and it has a very nice back-end that integrates also the web server, so you don’t need to install one. Anyway, I also like Flask, so I use it whenever python is involved.

This web app is a very basic one and I’ve made it just for fun. I’ve only supported setting the outputs, but you can use it as a base template to do whatever you like and add more functionality. You can make tons of automation using Python scripting and the SDG1025, it’s up to your imagination.

Have in mind, that I’ve noticed some times that the communication was broken and I had to restart the device. I didn’t find the cause it as it wasn’t often, but I suspect the device…

That was my last stupid project for the next few months as I plan to have some rest and make some proper holidays.

Have fun!

Benchmarking TensorFlow Lite for microcontrollers on Linux SBCs


([06.08.2019] Edit: I’ve added an extra section with more benchmarks for the nanopi-neo4)

([07.08.2019] Edit: I’ve added 3 more results that Shaw Tan posted in the comments)

In this post, I’ll show you the results of benchmarking the TensorFlow Lite for microcontrollers (tflite-micro) API not on various MCUs this time, but on various Linux SBCs (Single-Board Computers). For this purpose I’ve used a code which I’ve originally written to test and compare the tflite-micro API which is written in C++ and the tflite python API. This is the repo:

Then, I thought why not test the tflite-micro API on various SBCs that I have around.

For those who don’t know what an SBC is, then it’s just a small computer with an application CPU like the Raspberry Pi (RPi). Probably everyone knows RPi but there are more than a 100 SBCs in the market in all forms and sizes (e.g. RPi  has currently released 13 different models).


Although I have plenty of those boards around, I didn’t used all of them. That would be very time consuming. I’ve selected quite a few though. Before I list the devices and their specs, here is a photo of the testing bench. A couple of SBCs have missed the photo-shooting and joined the party later.

Top row, from left to right:

Bottom row, from left to right:

  • Nanopi Neo 4: Rockchip RK3399, Dual Cortex-A72 @ 1.8GHz + Quad Cortex-A53 @ 1.5GHz
  • Nanopi K1 Plus: Allwinner H5, Quad Cortex-A53 @ 1.3GHz, 3GB DDR3
  • Nanopi Neo2: Allwinner H5, Quad Cortex A53 @ 900MHz, 512MB DDR3
  • Orangepi Prime: Allwinner H5, Quad Cortex-A53 @ 1.3 GHz, 2GB DDR3

Missing from the photo:

  • Nanopi neo: Allwinner H3, Quad Cortex-A7 @ 1.2GHz, 512MB DDR3
  • Nanopi duo: Allwinner H2+, QuadCortex-A7 @ 1GHz, 512MB DDR3

I’ve tried to use the same distribution packages for each SBC, so in the majority of the boards the rootfs and packages are from Ubuntu 18.04, but the kernels are different versions. It’s impossible to have the exact same kernel version as not every SoC has a mainline support. Also, even if the SoC has a mainline support, like H5 and RK3399, the SBC itself probably doesn’t. Therefore, each board needs a device-tree and several patches for a specific kernel version to be able to boot properly. There are build systems like Armbian, which make things easier, but it supports only a fragment of the available SBCs. The SoC and SBC support in the mainline kernel is an important issue for a long time now, but let’s continue.

In this table I’ve listed the image I’ve used for each board. These are the boards that I’ve benchmarked myself

SBC Image Kernel
AML-S905X-CC Ubuntu 18.04 Headless 4.19.55
Raspberry Pi 3 B+ Ubuntu 18.04 Server 4.4.0-1102
Jetson nano Ubuntu 18.04 4.9
Nanopi Duo Armbian 5.93 4.19.63
Nanopi Neo Armbian 5.93 4.19.63
Nanopi Neo2 Armbian 5.93 4.19.63
Nanopi Neo 4 Armbian 5.93 4.4.179
Nanopi Neo 4 (2) Yocto build 4.4.176
Nanopi K1 Plus Armbian 5.93 4.19.63
Orangepi Prime Armbian 5.93 4.19.63
Beaglebone Black Debian 9.5

This table is from other SBCs that Shaw Tan benchmarked and posted the results in the comments

SBC Image Kernel
Google Coral Dev Board Debian Stretch aarch64 4.9.51-imx
Rock Pi 4B Debian Stretch aarch64 4.4.154
Raspberry Pi 4 Rasbian 4.19.59-v8

Got another result from RemoteC in the comments

SBC Image Kernel
Odroid MC1 Linux odroid 4.14.141-169
Odroid N2 Linux odroid 4.9.216-71

But why use tflite-micro?

That’s a good question. Why use the tflite-micro API on a Linux SBC? The tflite-micro is meant to be used with small microcontrollers and there is the tflite C++ API for Linux, which is more powerful and complete. Let’s see what are the pros and cons of the C++ tflite API.


  • Supports more Ops
  • Supports also Python (that doesn’t have to do with C++ but is a plus for the API)
  • Can scale to multi-core CPUs
  • GPU, TPU and NCS2 support
  • Can load flatbuffer models from the file system
  • Small binary (~300KB)


  • It’s hard to build
  • A lot of dependencies
  • The whole API is integrated in the git repo and it’s very difficult to get only the needed files to create your custom build via Make or CMake
  • Not available pre-build binaries for architectures other than x86_64

I’ve tried to build the API in a couple of SBCs and that failed for several different reasons. For now only RPi seems to be supported, but again it’s quite difficult to re-use the library, it seems like you need to develop your application inside the tensorflow repo and it’s difficult to extract the headers. Maybe there is somewhere a documentation on how to do this, but I couldn’t find it. I’ve also seen other people having the same issue (see here), but none of the suggestions worked for me (except in my x86_64 workstation). At some point I was tired to keep trying, so I quit. Also the build was taking hours just to see it fail.

Then I though, why not use the tflite-micro API which worked fine on the STM32F7 before and since it’s a simple library that builds on MCUs and the only dependency is flatbuffers, then it should build everywhere else (including Linux for those SBCs). So I’ve tried this and it worked just fine. Then I though to run some benchmarks on various SBCs I have around to see how it performs and if it’s something usable.

tflite model

Before I present the results, let’s have a quick look at the tflite model. The model is the same I’ve used in the tests I’ve done in the “ML for embedded” series here, here and here. The complexity (MACC) of this model is measured in multiply-and-accumulate (MAC) operations, which is the fundamental operation in ML.

For the specific mnist model I’ve used, the MACC is 2,852,598. That means that to get the output from any random input the CPU executes 2.8 million MAC operations. That’s I guess a medium size model for a NN, but definitely not a small one.

Because now we’re using the tflite-micro API, the model is not a file which is loaded from the file system, but it’s embedded in the executable binary, as the flatbuffer model is just a byte array in a header file.

Build the benchmark

If you want to test on any other SBC, you just need g++ and cmake. If your distro supports apt, then run this:

sudo apt install cmake g++

Then you just need to clone the repo, build the benchmark and run it. Just be aware that the output filename is changing depending on the CPU architecture. So for an aarch64 CPU run those commands:

git clone
cd tflite-micro-python-comparison/

And you’ll get the results.

(For a cortex-a7, the executable name will be mnist-tflite-micro-armv7l)


Note: I haven’t done any custom optimization for any of the SBCs or the compiler flags for each architecture. The compiler is let to automatically detect the best options depending the system. Also, I’m running the stock images, without even change the performance governor, which is set “ondemand” for all the SBCs. Finally, I haven’t applied any overclocking for any of the SBCs, therefore the CPU frequencies are whatever those images have set for the ondemand governor.

Ok, so now let’s see the results I got on those SBCs. I’ve created a table with the average time of 1000 inferences for each test. In this list I’ve also added the results from my workstation and also in the end the results of the exact same code with the exact same tflite model running on the STM32F746, which is an MCU and baremetal firmware.

SBC Average for 1000 runs  (ms)
Ryzen 2700X (this is not SBC) 2.19
AML-S905X-CC 15.54
Raspberry Pi 3 B+ 13.47
Jetson nano 9.34
Nanopi Duo 36.76
Nanopi Neo 16
Nanopi Neo2 22.83
Nanopi-Neo4 5.82
Nanopi-Ne4 (2) 5.21
Nanopi K1 Plus 14.32
Orangepi Prime 18.40
Beaglebone Black 97.03
STM32F746 @ 216MHz 76.75
STM32F746 @ 288 MHz 57.95

The next table has results that Shaw Tan, RemoteC and Huynh posted in the comments section:

SBC Average for 1000 runs  (ms)
Google Coral Dev Board 12.40
Rock Pi 4B 6.33
Raspberry Pi 4 8.35
Odroid MC1 – core 0 7.82
Odroid MC1 – core 1 15.32
Odroid N2 – core 1 9.90
Odroid N2 – core 5 6.35
imx6ull @ 900MHz 31

There are many interesting results on this table.

First, the RK3399 cpu (nanopi-neo4) outperforms the Jetson nano and it’s only 2.6 times slower that my Ryzen 2700X cpu. Amazing, right? This boards costs only $50. Excellent performance on this specific test.

Then the Jetson nano needs 9.34 ms. Be aware that this is a single CPU thread time! If you remember, here the tflite python API scored 0.98 ms in MAXN mode and 2.42 in 5W mode. The tflite python API supported the GPU though and used CUDA acceleration. So, for this board, when using the GPU and the tflite you get 9.5x (MAXN mode) and 3.8x (5W mode) better performance. Nevertheless, 9.34 ms doesn’t sound that bad compared to the 5W mode.

Beaglebone black is the worst performer. It’s even slower than the STM32F7, which is quite expected as BBB is a single core running @ 1GHz and the code is running on top of Linux. So the OS has a huge impact in performance, compared to baremetal. This raises an interesting question…

What would happened if the tflite-micro was running baremetal on those application CPUs? Without OS? Interesting question, maybe I get to it at another post some time in the future.

Then, the rest SBCs lie somewhere in the middle.

Finally, it worth noting that the nanopi neo is an SBC that costs only $9.99! That’s an amazing price/performance ratio for running the tflite-micro API. This board amazed me with those results (given its price). Also it’s supposed to be an LTS board, which means that it will be in stock for some time, though it’s not clear for how long.

Additional benchmarks on the nanopi-neo4 (RK3399)

Since the nanopi-neo4 performed better than the other SBCs, I’ve build an image using Yocto. Since I’m the owner and maintainer of this layer, I need to say that this is actually a mix of the armbian u-boot and kernel versions and patches and also I’ve used some parts from meta-sunxi, but I’ve done more integrations to like supporting the GPU and some other things.

Initially, I’ve tried the armbian build because it’s easy for everyone to reproduce, but then I though to test also my Yocto layer. Therefore I’ve used this repo here:

There are details how to use the layer and build in the README file of this repo, but this is the command I’ve used to build the image I’ve tested (after setting up the repo as described in the readme).

MACHINE=nanopi-neo4 DISTRO=rk-none source ./ build

Then in the build/conf/local.conf file I’ve added this line in the end of the file

IMAGE_INSTALL += " cmake "

And finally I’ve build with this command:

bitbake rk-image-testing

Then I’ve flashed the image on an SD card:

# change sdX with your SD card
sudo umount /dev/sdX*
sudo dd if=build/tmp/deploy/images/nanopi-neo4/rk-image-testing-nanopi-neo4.wic.bz2 of=/dev/sdX status=progress
sudo eject /dev/sdX

This distro gave me a bit better results. I’ve also tried to benchmark each core separately by running the script like this:

taskset --cpu-list 0 ./build-aarch64/src/mnist-tflite-micro-aarch64

Two test all cores you need to replace in the above script the 0 with the number of cores from 0 to 5. Cores [0-3] are the Cortex-A53 and [4-5] are the Cortex-A72, which are faster. Without using taskset the OS will always run the script on the A72. These are the results:

Core number Results (ms)
0 12.39
1 12.40
2 12.39
3 12.93
4 5.21
5 5.21

Therefore, compare to the armbian distro there’s a slight better performance of 0.61 ms, but this might be on the different kernel version, I don’t know, but it the difference seems to be constant on every inference run I’ve tested.


From the above results I’ve come to some conclusions, which I’ll list in a pros/cons list of using the tflite-micro API on a SBC running a Linux OS.


  • Very simple to build and use
  • Minimal dependencies
  • Easy to extract the proper source and header files from the Tensorflow repo (compared to tflite)
  • Performance is not that bad (that’s a personal opinion though)
  • Portability. You can compile the exact same code on any CPU or MCU and also on Linux or baremetal (maybe also in Windows with MinGW, I haven’t tested).


  • No multi-threading. The tflite-micro only supports 1 thread.
  • The model is embedded in the executable as a byte array, therefore if you want to be able to load tflite models from the file system, then you need to implement your own parser, which just loads the tflite model file from the filesystem to a dynamically allocated byte array.
  • It’s slower compared to tflite C++ API

From the above points (I may missed few, so I’ll update if somethings comes to my mind), it’s clear that the performance using the tflite-micro API on a multi-core CPU and in Linux, will be worse compared to the tflite API. I only have numbers to do a comparison between tflite and tflite-micro for my Ryzen 2700x and the Jetson nano, but not for the other boards. See the table:

CPU tflite-micro/tflite speed ratio
Ryzen 2700X 10.63x
Jetson nano (5W) 9.46x
Jetson nano (MAXN) 3.86x

The above table shows that the tflite API is 10.63x faster than tflite-micro on the 2700x and 9.46x and 3.86x faster on the Jetson nano (depending the mode). This a great difference, of course.

What I would keep from this benchmark is that the tflite-micro is easy to build and use on any architecture, but there’s a performance impact. This impact is much larger if the SoC is multi-core, has a GPU or any other accelerator which can’t be used from the tflite API.

It’s up to you to decide, if the performance of the tflite-micro is enough for your model (depending the MACC). If it is, then you can just use tflite-micro instead. Of course, don’t expect to run inferences on real-time video but for real-time audio it should be probably enough.

Anyway, with tflite-micro it’s very easy to test and evaluate for your model on your SBC.

Have fun!

Controlling a 3D object in Unity3D with teensy and MPU-6050


Have a look at this image.

What does it look like? Is it the new Star Wars? Nope. It’s a 3D real time rendering from a “game” that I’ve build just to test my new stupid project with the MPU6050 motion tracking sensor. Cool isn’t it? Before I get there let me do a short introduction.

The reason I’ve enjoyed this project so much, is that I’ve started this project without knowing anything about 3D game engines, skyboxes and quaternions and after 1.5 day I got this thing up and running! I don’t say this to praise myself. On the contrary, I mention this to praise the current state of the free and open source software. Therefore, I’ll use some space here to praise the people that contribute to FOSS and make for others easy and fast to experiment and prototype.

I don’t know for how long you’ve been engineers, hobbyists or anything related and for how long. But from my experience, trying to make something similar 15 or 10 years ago (and also on a Linux machine), would be really hard and time spending procedure. Of course, I don’t mean getting the same 3D results, I mean a result relative to that era. Maybe I would spend several months, because I would have to do almost everything by myself. Now though, I’ve only wrote a few hundred lines of glue code and spend some time on YouTube and surfing github and some other sources around the web. Nowadays, there are so many things that are free/open and available that is almost impossible not to find what you’re looking for. I’m not only talking about source code, but also tools, documentation, finished projects and resources (even open hardware). There are so many people that provide their knowledge and the outcome of their work/research nowadays, that you can find almost everything. You can learn almost everything from the internet, too. OK, probably it’s quite difficult to become a nuclear physicist using only online sources, but you can definitely learn anything related to programming and other engineering domains. It doesn’t matter why people decide to make their knowledge available publicly, all it matters is that it’s out there, available for everyone to use it.

And thanks to those people, I’ve managed to install Unity3D on my Ubuntu, learn how to use it to make what I needed, found a free to use 3D model for the Millennium Falcon, used Blender on Linux to edit the 3D model, found a tool to create a Skybox that resembles the universe, found an HID example for the teensy 3.2, the source code for the MPU6050 and how to calibrate it and finally dozens of posts with information about all those things. Things like how to use lens flares, mesh colliders to control flare visibility on cameras with flare layers, event system for GUI interactions and several other stuff that I wasn’t even aware of before, everything explained from other people in forums in a way that it’s far easier to read from any available documentation. Tons of information.

Then I just put all the pieces together and wrote the glue code and this is the result.

(Excuse, the bad video quality, but I’ve used my terrible smartphone camera)

It is a great time to be an engineer or a hobbyist and having all those tools and information available to your hands. All you need is just some time for playing and making stupid projects 😉

All the source code and files for this project are available here:

Note: This post is not targeting 3D graphics developers in no way. It’s meant mostly for embedded engineers or hobbyists.

So, let’s dive into the project…


To make the project I’ve used various software tools and only two hardware components. Let’s see the components.

Teensy 3.2

You’re not limited on Teensy 3.2, but you can use any Teensy that supports the RawHID lib. Teensy 3.2 it’s based on the NXP MK20DX256VLH7 which has a Cortex-M4 core running at 72 MHz and can be overclocked easily using the Arduino IDE up to 96MHz. It has various of peripherals and the pinout exports everything you need to build various interesting projects. For this project I’ve only used the USB and I2C. Teensy is not the cheapest MCU board out there as it costs around $20, but it comes with a great support and it’s great for prototyping.


According to TDK (which manufactures the MPU-6050) this is a Six-Axis (Gyro + Accelerometer) MEMS MotionTracking Devices which has an onboard Digital Motion Processor (DMP). According the TDK web page I should use a ™ on every word less than 4 characters in the previous sentence. Anyway, to put it simple it’s a package that contains a 3-axis Gyro, a 3-axis Accelerometer and a special processing unit that performs some complex calculations on the sensor’s data. You can find small boards with the sensor on ebay that cost ~1.5 EUR, which is dirt cheap. The sensor is 3V3 and 5V capable, which makes it easy to be used with a very wide range of development boards and kits.

Connecting the hardware

The hardware connections are easy as both the Teensy and the mpu-6050 are voltage level compatible. The following table shows the connections you need to make.

Teensy 3.2 (pin) MPU-6050
18 SDA
19 SCL
23 INT

That’s it, you’re done. Now all you have to do, is to connect Teensy 3.2 to your workstation, calibrate the sensor and then build the firmware and flash it.

Calibrating the MPU-6050

Not all the MPUs are made the same. Since it’s a quite complex device, both the gyro and the accelerometer (accel) have tolerances. Those tolerances affect the readings you get, for example if you place the sensor on a perfectly flat space then you’ll get a reading from the sensor that it’s not on a flat space, which means that you’re reading the tolerances (offsets). Therefore, first you need to place the sensor on a flat space and then use the readings to calibrate the sensor and minimize those offsets. Because every chip has different tolerances, you need to do this for every sensor, so you don’t do this once for a single sensor and then re-use the same values also for others (even if they are in the same production batch). This sensor supports to upload to it those offset values using some I2C registers in order to perform calculations with those offsets, which in the end offloads the external CPU.

Normally, if you need maximum accuracy during calibration, then you need an inclinometer in order to place your sensor completely flat and a vibration free base. You can find inclinometers on ebay or amazon, from 7 EUR up to thousands of EUR. Of course, you get what you pay. Have in mind that an inclinometer is just a tilt sensor, but it’s calibrated in the production. A cheap inclinometer may suck in many different ways, e.g. maybe is not even calibrated or the calibration reference is not calibrated or the tilt sensor itself is crap. Anyway, for this project you don’t really need to use this.

For now just place the sensor in a surface that seems flat. Also because you probably have already soldered the pin-headers, try to flatten the sensor compare to the surface. We really don’t need accuracy here, just an approximation, so make your eye an inclinometer.

Another important thing to know is that when you power-up the sensor then the orientation is zeroed at the current orientation. That means if the sensor is pointing south then this direction will always be the starting point. This is important for when you connect the sensor to the 3D object, then you need to put the sensor flat and pointing to that object on your screen and then power-on (connect the USB cable to Teensy).

Note: Before you start the calibration you need to leave the module powered on for a few minutes in order for the temperature to stabilize. This is very important, don’t skip this step.

OK, so now you should have your sensor connected to Teensy and on a flat(-ish) surface. Now you need to need to flash the calibration firmware. I’ve included two calibration source codes in the repo. The easiest one to use is in `mpu6050-calibration/mpu6050-raw-calibration/mpu6050-raw-calibration.ino`. I’ve got this source code from here.

Note: In order to be able to build the firmware on the Arduino IDE, you need to add this library here. The Arduino library in this repo is for both the MPU-6050 and the I2Cdev which is needed from all the source codes. Just copy from this folder the I2Cdev and MPU6050 in to your Arduino library folder.

When you build and upload the `mpu6050-raw-calibration.ino` on the Teensy, then you also need to use the Arduino IDE to open the Serial Monitor. When you do that, then you’ll get this prompt repeatedly:

Send any character to start calibrating...

Press Enterin the output textbox of the Serial Monitor and the calibration will start. In my case there were a few iterations and then I got the calibration values in the output:

            ax	ay	az	gx	gy	gz
average values:		-7	-5	16380	0	1	0
calibration offsets:	1471	-3445	1355	-44	26	26

MPU-6050 is calibrated.

Use these calibration offsets in your code:

Now copy-paste the above code block in to your
'teensy-motion-hid/teensy-motion-hid.ino' file
in function setCalibrationValues().

As the message says, now just open the `teensy-motion-hid/teensy-motion-hid.ino` file and copy the mpu.set*function calls in the setCalibrationValues()function.

Advanced calibration

If you want to see a few more details regarding calibration and an example on how to use a PID controller for calibrating the sensor and then use a jupyter notebook to analyze the results, then continue here. Otherwise, you can skip this section as it’s not really needed.

In order to calculate the calibration offsets you can use a PID controller. For those who doesn’t know what PID controller is, then you’ll have to see this first (or if you know how negative feedback on op-amps works, then think that it’s quite the same). Generally, is a control feedback loop that is used a lot in control systems (e.g. HVAC for room temperature, elevators e.t.c).

Anyway, in order to calibrate the sensor using a PID controller, then you need to build and upload the `mpu6050-calibration/mpu6050-pid-calibration/mpu6050-pid-calibration.ino` source code. I won’t get in to the details of the code, but the important thing is that this code uses 6 different PID controllers, one for each offset you want to calculate (3 for the accel. axes and 3 for the gyro axes). This source code is a modification I’ve made of this repo here.

Again, you need to let the sensor a few minutes powered on before perform the calibration and set it on a flat surface. When the firmware starts, then it will spit out numbers on the serial monitor. Here’s an example:


And this goes on forever. Each line is a comma separated list of values and the meaning of those values from left to right is:

  • Average Acc X value
  • Average Acc X offset
  • Average Acc Y value
  • Average Acc Y offset
  • Average Acc Z value
  • Average Acc Z offset
  • Average Gyro X value
  • Average Gyro X offset
  • Average Gyro Y value
  • Average Gyro Y offset
  • Average Gyro Z value
  • Average Gyro Z offset

Now, all you need to do is to let this running for a couple of seconds (30-60) and then copy all the output from the serial monitor to a file named calibration_data.txt. The file actually already exists in the `/rnd/bitbucket/teensy-hid-with-unity3d/mpu6050-calibration` folder and it contains the values from my sensor, so you can use those to experiment or erase the file and put yours in its place. Also, be aware that when you copy the output from the serial monitor to the txt file, you need to delete any empty line in the end for the notebook scripts to work, otherwise, you’ll get an error in the jupyter notepad.

Note: while you running the calibration firmware you need to be sure that the there are no any vibrations on the surface. For example, if you put this on your desk then be sure that there’s no vibrations from you or any other equipment you may have running on the desk.

As I’m explaining quite thorough in the notebook how to use it, I’ll keep it simple here. Also, from this point I assume that you’ve read the jupyter notepad in the repo here.

You can use the notebook to visualize the PID controller output and also calculate the values to use for your sensor’s offsets. It’s interesting to see some plots here. As I mention in the notebook,  you can use the data_start_offset and data_end_offset, to plot different subsets of data for each axis.

This is the plot when data_start_offset=0 and data_end_offset=20.

Click on each image to zoom-in.

So, as you can see in the first 20 samples, the PID controller kicks in and tries to correct the error and as the error in the beginning is significant, you get this slope. See in the first 15 samples the error for the Acc X axis is corrected from more than -3500 to near zero. For the gyro things are a bit different, as it’s more sensitive and fluctuates a bit more. Let’s see the same plots with data_start_offset=20 and data_end_offset=120.

On the above images, I’ve started from sample 20, in order to remove the steep slope during the first PID controller input/output correction. Now you can see that the data that are coming from the accel. and gyro axes are fluctuating quite much and the PID tries on every iteration to correct this error. Of course, you’ll never get a zero error as the sensor is quite sensitive and there’s also thermal and electronic noise and also vibrations that you can’t sense but the sensor does. So, what you do in such cases is that you use the average value for each axis. Be careful, though. You don’t want to include the first samples in the average value calculations for each axis, because that would give you values that are way off. As you can see in the notepad here, I’m using the skip_first_n_data to skip the first 100 samples and then calculate the average from the rest values.

Finally, you can use the calculated values from the “Source code values” section and copy those in the firmware. You can use whatever method you like to calibrate the sensor, just be aware that if you try both methods you won’t get the same values! Even if you run the same test twice you won’t the exact same values, but they should be similar.

HID Manager

In the hid_manager/ folder you’ll find the source code from a tool I’ve written and I named hid_manager. Let me explain what this does and why is needed.

The HID manager is the software that receives the HID raw messages from Teensy and then copies the data in to a buffer that is shared with Unity. Note that this code works only for Linux. If you want to use the project on Windows then you need to port this code and actually is the only part of the project that is OS specific.

So, why use this HID manager? The problem with Unity3D and most similar software is that although they have some kind of input API, this is often quite complicated. I mean, I’ve tried to have a look at the API and try to use it, but quickly I’ve realized that it would take too much effort and time to create my own custom input controller for Unity and the use it in there. So, I’ve decided it to make it quick and dirty. In this case, though, I would say that quick and dirty, is not a bad thing (except that it’s OS specific). Therefore, what is the easiest and fast way to import real-time data to any other software that runs on the same host? Using some kind of inter-process communication, of course. In this case, the easiest way to do that was to use the Linux /tmp folder, which is mount in the system’s RAM memory and then create a file buffer in the /tmp and share this buffer between the Unity3D game application and the hid manager.

To do that I’ve written a script in hid_manager/, which makes sure to create this buffer and occupy 64 bytes in the RAM. The USB HID packets I’m using are 64 bytes long, so we don’t need more RAM than that. Of course, I’m not using all the bytes, but it’s good to have more than the exact the same number. For example, the first test was to send only the Euler angles from the sensor, but then I’ve realized that I was getting affected from the Gimbal lock effect, so I also had to add the Quaternion values, that I was getting anyways from the sensor (I’ll come back to those later). So, having more available size is always nice and actually in this case the USB packet buffer is always 64 bytes, so you get them for free. The problem arises when you need more than 64-byts, then you need to use some data serialization and packaging.

Also, note in both the teensy-motion-hid/teensy-motion-hid.ino and hid_manager/hid_manager.c, the indianness is the same, which makes things a bit easier and faster.

In order to build the code, just run make inside the folder and then you need first flash the Teensy with the teensy-motion-hid.ino firmware and then run the manager using the script.


If you try to run the script before the Teensy is programmed, then you’ll get an error as the HID device won’t be found attached and enumerated on your system.

Note: if the HID manager is not running then on the serial monitor output you’ll get this message

Unable to transmit packet

The HID manager supports two modes. The default mode is that it runs and it just copies the incoming data from the HID device to the buffer. The second one is the debug mode. In the debug mode, it prints also the 64 bytes that it gets from the Teensy. To run the HID manager in debug mode run this command.

DEBUG=1 ./

By running the above command you’ll get an output in your console similar to this:

$ DEBUG=1 ./ 
    This script starts the HID manager. You need to connect
    the teensy via USB to your workstation and flash the proper
    firmware that works with this tool.
    More info here:
Controlling a 3D object in Unity3D with teensy and MPU-6050
Usage for no debugging mode: $ ./ Usage for debugging mode (it prints the HID incoming data): $ DEBUG=1 ./ Debug ouput is set to: 1 Starting HID manager... Denug mode enabled... Open shared memfile found rawhid device recv 64 bytes: AB CD A9 D5 BD 37 4C 2B E5 BB 0B D3 BD BE 00 FC 7F 3F 00 00 54 3B 00 00 80 38 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 F9 29 00 00 01 00 00 00 E1 94 FF 1F recv 64 bytes: AB CD 9D 38 E5 3B 28 E3 AB 37 B6 EA AB BE 00 FC 7F 3F 00 00 40 3B 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 B8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 F9 29 00 00 01 00 00 00 E1 94 FF 1F ...

The 0xAB 0xCD bytes are just a preamble.

Note: I haven’t added any checks on the data, like checking the preamble or having checksums e.t.c. as there wasn’t a reason for this. In other case I would consider at least a naive checksum like xor’ing the bytes, which is fast.

In the next video you can see on the left top side the quaternion data output from the Teensy and on the left bottom the raw hid data in the hid manager while it’s running in debug mode.

Of course, printing the data on both ends adds significant latency in model motion.

Teensy 3.2 firmware

The firmware for Teensy is located in teensy-motion-hid/teensy-motion-hid.ino. There’s no much to say here, just open the file with the Arduino IDE and then build and upload the firmware.

The important part in the code are those lines here:

        mpu.dmpGetQuaternion(&q, fifoBuffer);

        un_hid_payload pl;
        pl.packet.preamble[0] = 0xAB;
        pl.packet.preamble[1] = 0xCD;

        mpu.dmpGetEuler(euler, &q);
        pl.packet.x.number = euler[0] * 180 / M_PI;
        pl.packet.y.number = euler[1] * 180 / M_PI;
        pl.packet.z.number = euler[2] * 180 / M_PI;
        pl.packet.qw.number = q.w;
        pl.packet.qx.number = q.x;
        pl.packet.qy.number = q.y;
        pl.packet.qz.number = q.z;

If the ADD_EULER_TO_HID is enabled, then the Euler angles will also be added in the hid packet, but this might be add a bit more latency.

Now that the data are copied from Teensy to a shared memory buffer in /tmp, you can use Unity3D to read those data and use them in your game. Before proceed with the Unity3D section, though, let’s open a short parenthesis on the kind of data you get from the sensor.

Sensor data

As I’ve mentioned, the sensor does all the hard work and maths to calculate the Euler and the quaternion values from the 6 axes values in real-time (which is a great acceleration). But what are those values, why we need them and why I prefer to use only the quaternion? Usually I prefer to give just a quick explanation and leave the pros explain it better than me, so I’ll the same now.

The Euler angles is just the angle of the rotation for each axis in the 3D space. In air navigation those angles are known as roll, pitch and yaw and by knowing those angles you know your object’s rotation. You can see also this video which explains this better than I do. There’s one problem with Euler angles and this is that if two of the 3 axes are driven in a parallel configuration then you loose one degree of freedom. This is a video explains this in more detail.

As I’ve already mentioned, the sensor calculates the quaternion values. Quaternion is much more difficult to explain as it’s a 4-D number and anything more then 3-D is difficult to visualize and explain. I will try to avoid to explain this myself and just post this link here, which explains quaternions and try to represent them to the 3D space. The important thing you need to know, is that the quaternion doesn’t suffer from the gimbal lock, also it’s supported in Unity3D and it’s supposed to make calculations faster compared to vector calculations for the CPU/GPU.

Unity3D project

For this project I wanted to interact with a 3D object on the screen using the mpu-6050. Then I remembered that I’ve seen a video on Unity3D which seemed nice, so when I’ve seen that there was a Linux build (but not officially supported), then I thought to give it a try. When I’ve started the project I knew nothing about this software, but for doing simple things it seems nice. I had quite a few difficulties, but with some google-fu I’ve fixed all the issues.

Installing Unity3D on Ubuntu is not pain free, but it’s not that hard either and when you succeed, it works great. I’ve download the installer from here (see always the last post which has the latest version) and to install Unity Hub I’ve followed this guide here. Unity3D is not open source, but it’s free for personal use and you need to create an account in order to get your free license. I guess I could use an open 3D game machine, but since it was free and I wanted for personal use, I went for that. In order, to install the same versions that I’ve used run the following commands:

# install dependencies
sudo apt install libgtk2.0-0 libsoup2.4-1 libarchive13 libpng16-16 libgconf-2-4 lib32stdc++6 libcanberra-gtk-module

# install unity
chmod +x UnitySetup-2019.1.0f2

# install unity hub
chmod +x UnityHubSetup.AppImage

When you open the project, you’ll find in the bottom tab some files. The one that’s interesting for you is the HID_controller.cs. This file in the repo is located in here: Unity3D-project/gyro-acc-test/Assets/HID_Controller.cs. In this file the important bits are the MemoryMappedfile object which is instantiated in the start() function and opens the shared file in the /tmp and reads the mpu6050 data and the update() function.

void Start()
    hid_buf = new byte[64];

    // transform.Rotate(30.53f, -5.86f, -6.98f);
    Debug.developerConsoleVisible = true;
    Debug.Log("Unity3D demo started...");

    mmf = MemoryMappedFile.CreateFromFile("/tmp/hid-shared-buffer", FileMode.OpenOrCreate, "/tmp/hid-shared-buffer");
    using (var stream = mmf.CreateViewStream()) {
        var data = stream.Read(hid_buf, 0, 64);
        if (data > 0) {
            Debug.Log("Data in: " + data);
            float hid_x = System.BitConverter.ToSingle(hid_buf, 2);
            Debug.Log("x: " + hid_x);


// Update is called once per frame
void Update()
    using (var stream = mmf.CreateViewStream()) {
        var data = stream.Read(hid_buf, 0, 64);
        if (data > 0) {
            float qw = System.BitConverter.ToSingle(hid_buf, (int) DataIndex.qW);
            float qx = System.BitConverter.ToSingle(hid_buf, (int) DataIndex.qX);
            float qy = System.BitConverter.ToSingle(hid_buf, (int) DataIndex.qY);
            float qz = System.BitConverter.ToSingle(hid_buf, (int) DataIndex.qZ);
            transform.rotation = new Quaternion(-qy, -qz, qx, qw);

As you can see in the start() function, the mmf MemoryMappedFile is created and attached to the /tmp/hid-shared-buffer. Then there’s a dummy read from the file to make sure that the stream works and prints a debug message. This code runs only once when the HID_Controller class is created.

In update() function the code creates a stream connected to the memory mapped file, then reads the data, parses the proper float values from the buffer and finally creates a Quaternion object with the 4D values and updates the object rotation.

You’ll also notice that the values in the quaternion are not in the (x,y,z,w) order, but (-y,-z,x,w). This is weird, right? But this happens for a couple of reasons that I’ll try to explain. In page 40 of this PDF datasheet you’ll find this image.

These are the X,Y,Z axes on the chip. Notice also the signs, they are positive on the direction is shown and negative on the opposite direction. The dot on the top corner indicated where pin 1 is located on the plastic package. The next image is the stick I’ve made with the sensor board attached on it on which I’ve drawn the dot position and the axes.

Therefore, you see that the X and Y axes are swapped (compared to the pdf image), so the quaternion from (x,y,z,w) becomes (y,x,z,w). But wait… in the code is (-y,-z,x,w)! Well, that troubled me also for a moment, then I’ve read this in the documentation, “Most of the standard scripts in Unity assume that the y-axis represents up in your 3D world.“, which means that you need also to swap Y and Z, but because in the place of Y now is X, then you replace X with Z, so the quaternion from (y,x,z,w) becomes (y,z,x,w). But wait! What about the “-” signs? Well if you see again the first image it shows the sign for each axis. Because of the way you hold the stick, compared to the moving object on the screen reverses that rotation for the y and z axes, then the quaternion becomes (-y,-z,x,w). Well, I don’t know anything about 3D graphics, unity and quaternions, but at least the above explanation makes sense and it works, so… this must be it.

I’ve found the Millenium Falcon 3D model here and it’s free to use (except that any star-wars related stuff are trademarked and you can’t really use them for any professional use). This is what I meant in the intro, all the software I’ve used until now was free or open. So A. Meerow, who build this model did this 3D mesh in his free time, gave it for free and I was able to save dozens of hours to make the same thing. Thanks mate.

I had a few issues with the 3D model though when I imported the model in Unity. One issue was that there was a significant offset on one of the axis, another issue was that because of the previous thing I’ve mentioned I had to export the model with the Y – Z axes swapped and finally another issue was that the texture when importing the .obj file wasn’t applied properly, so I had to import the model in the .fbx format. To fix those things I’ve downloaded and used Blender. I’ve also used blender for the first time, but it was quite straight forward to use and fix those issues.

Blender is a free and open source 3D creation suite and I have to say that it looks beautiful and very professional tool. There are so many options, buttons and menus that makes clear that this is a professional grade tool. And it’s free! Amazing.

Anyway, after I’ve fixed those things and exported the model to the .fbx format I wanted to change the default Skybox in Unity3D and I wanted something that seems like deep space. So I’ve found another awesome free and open tool, which is named Spacescape and creates a spaceboxes with stars and nebulas, using algorithms and it also has a ton of options to play with. The funny thing was that I’ve tried to build it on my Ubuntu 18.04 but I had a lot of issues as it’s based on a quite old Qt version and also needs some dependencies that also failed. Anyway, I’ve downloaded the Windows executable and it worked fine with Wine (version 3.0). This is a screenshot of the tool running on my ubuntu.

These are the default options and I’ve actually used them as the result was great.

Finally, I’ve just added some lights, a lens flare and a camera rotation in the Unity3D scene and it was done.

Play the game demo

In order to “play” the game (yeah I know it’s not a game, it’s just a moving 3d object on a scene), you need to load the project from the Unity3D-project/gyro-acc-test/ folder. Then you just build it by pressing Ctrl+B and this will create an executable file named “teensy-wars.x86_64” and at the same time it will also launch the game. After you build the project (File >> Build Settings), you can just lauch the teensy-wars.x86_64 executable.

Make sure that before you do this, you’re running the hid_manager in the background and that you’ve flashed Teensy with the teensy-motion-hid/teensy-motion-hid.ino firmware and the mpu-6050 sensor is connected properly.


I’m amazed with this project for many reasons. It took me 1.5 day to complete it. Now that I’m writing those lines, I’m thinking that I’ve spend more time in documenting this project and write the article rather implement it and the reason for this the power of open source, the available free software (free to use or open), the tons of available information in documents, manuals and forums and finally and most important the fact that people are willing to share their work and know-how. Of course, open source it’s not new to me, I do this for years also by myself, but I was amazed that I was able to build something like this without even use any of those tools before in such short time. Prototyping has become so easy nowadays. It’s really amazing.

Anyway, I’ve really enjoyed this project and I’ve enjoyed more the fact that I’ve realized the power that everyone has in their hands nowadays. It’s really easy to build amazing stuff, very fast and get good results. Of course, I need to mention, that this can’t replace the domain expertise in any way. But still it’s nice that engineers from other domains can jump into another unknown domain and make something quick and dirty and get some idea how things are working.

Have fun!